Waterless and low-flow toilets save more water than money
Thursday, May 31, 2018
Waterless urinals and low-flow toilets are an increasingly pervasive investment being made by facilities managers and building owners throughout the world, mostly because they help save water.
However, there are arguments about the amount of money they save. The waterless units really do operate without water, but when making the case for their investment, the best argument might be a green one — as in the environment and not cash — as a corporate responsibility effort.
Determining exactly how much water a waterless urinal or toilet keeps from the sewer is somewhat complicated. The number depends on myriad variables, such as the amount of water the previous urinal water-based urinal used, the number of people using the urinal and how often those people will use it.
The average toilet uses anywhere from one to three gallons of water for each flush. Later generation toilets and urinals use less water than older toilets. The current federal standard for toilets in the U.S. is 1.6 gallons per flush.
A single urinal can use anywhere from 20,000 to 45,000 gallons of water each year, based on a building with a few dozen male employees each using the urinal three times a day. A larger building with one bathroom, three urinals and 120 male employees, could save about 237,000 gallons (or about 900,000 liters) of water each year.
These units cost between $250 to $500, much more than a traditional toilet, but they require little maintenance and often do not malfunction. There are other benefits, too, such as:
- They are easy to maintain.
- They require less money for water bills.
- They reduce the demand on waste management.
- They are environmentally friendly.
Figuring the payback period for these units can be a difficult process. Using the average of $2 per 1,000 gallons of water and the example of a model with an office with four men working in it, we can come up with some estimates.
Say each man flushes a toilet 2,000 times per year (about 5.5 times per day), meaning that the four men flush the toilet 4,000 times a year in the office. An older, non-waterless toilet using four gallons per flush will use 16,000 gallons, costing about $32 per year.
A conventional toilet, on the other hand, using 1.6 gallons per flush, if flushed 4,000 times a year, will use 6,400 gallons. At $2 per 1,000 gallons, this is about $13 per year.
A low-flow toilet using 1.28 gallons per flush, if flushed 4,000 times in one year, uses about 5,120 gallons. At $2 per 1,000 gallons, this will cost about $10.24 per year. Waterless toilets use no water, of course.
According to Popular Network, replacing an old toilet with a 1.6 gallon per flush model "will save … $19.20 per year. Since the cost of the toilet is $227, it will take 11.8 years for the new toilet to pay for itself. If the toilet were already being replaced then there would be no additional cost because all American toilets now have flow rates of 1.6 gallons per flush or less. Therefore, payback period would be zero years in this case."
Thus, water bills just are not enough of an incentive for business consideration in most cases, but the water conservation effort tells another story for any organization considering the change, unless the facility or organization has a substantial number of users.
When looking for a new toilet, though, you may wish to start by reviewing the WaterSense-labeled models, which are EPA-labeled units for water efficiency, designed to help consumers make smarter purchasing decisions.
Through the program, the featured models use 20 percent to 60 percent less water than average toilets and are tested by a third-party organization for quality and performance. This ensures that while the toilet uses less water to flush, the flush is still powerful and effective. Again, waterless urinals and toilets save even more resources than are listed by the EPA.
Ultimately, waterless and low-flow toilets save more water than money, but you may find that they are still worth the investment.
- Natural Resources
- Construction & Building Materials
- Facilities & Grounds
- Waste Management & Environmental
- EPEE: Cooling has an essential role to play
- The environmental benefits of LED lighting
- Can solar energy compete with fossil fuels?
- US vs. Europe: Comparing different approaches to renewable energy
- Window film improves building system performance
- Interior design is not about flowers
- Emerging green building material technologies to watch
- 3-D printing is revolutionizing construction and design fields
- Recommit to ‘health’ in healthcare
- Is a liberal arts education still worth pursuing?
- Public health cuts undermine US pandemic preparedness
- Is Google the new online travel agent alternative?
- Tech in 2020 that will change users’ behavior
See your work in future editions
Your content, Your Expertise,
Your Industry Needs YOUR Expert Voice & We've got the platform you needFind Out How