Study results show promise for using ultrasound to assess bone health
Thursday, March 28, 2019
Osteoporosis affects about 25 percent of women aged 65 years and over and about 5 percent of men aged 65 and over.
The annual number of total hip replacements among inpatients aged 45 and over more than doubled between 2000 and 2010, from 138,700 in 2000 to 310,800 in 2010.
The greatest increase in absolute numbers was in the 55–64 age group, where the number of total hip replacements almost tripled. The greatest percentage change was in the 45–54 age group, which experienced a 205 percent increase. The 45–54 age group also had the greatest increase in rate, which more than doubled from 45 to 117 total hip replacements per 100,000 population.
Unfortunately, most people are unaware that they have osteoporosis until they break a bone.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released guidelines for osteoporosis screening on Sept. 16, 2002, recommending that women who are 65 years or older be evaluated. Screening also can show low bone mass and the likelihood of developing osteoporosis.
Using an osteoporosis risk assessment instrument, the task force found low body weight (<70 kg) and lack of estrogen use to be the most appropriate clinical risk factors for initiating a screening bone density test in women less than 65 years.
Dual/energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for assessing bone health. Although effective in identifying those with low bone mineral density (BMD), using DXA to screen for bone health is limited by cost, size, and technical requirements to operate the machine. In addition, while levels are low, DXA exposes patients to ionizing radiation.
A recent study, however, showed that inexpensive ultrasound screenings for osteoporosis were equal to data gathered using DXA. Patients scheduled for DXA at the Robert C. Byrd Clinic, a rural primary care facility in Lewisburg, West Virginia, were recruited from June 2015 to June 2016.
Ultrasonography was used to scan the left and right calcaneus of the patients, and blood was collected from a finger prick for vitamin D analysis. Information was collected regarding Fracture Risk Assessment tool parameters, menstrual history, and drug and supplement use.
The researchers found data from the calcaneus was equal to data gathered from the DXA. Carolyn Komar, Ph.D., associate professor of biomedical sciences at West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine and a co-author on this study, noted that while ultrasound doesn’t yield the same information as a full DXA scan, ultrasound gives a clear enough snapshot for patients of concern and is a promising tool for assessing more people across multiple demographics.
- Best exercises for gluteus medius strengthening
- Pectoralis minor: Far from a minor problem
- The importance of hip internal rotation
- The top 5 exercises you should be doing
- 17 of the most specific, bizarre ICD-10 codes
- Are independent pharmacies really that profitable?
- The addictive eye drops that kill
- BSN or ADN? Nursing at a crossroads
- Steer clear of these delusional hiring practices
- What’s your office’s air pollution level?
- Cochise County: A beautiful little corner of Arizona
- Do ‘zero-tolerance’ policies in education really work?
- Prime space at board meetings
See your work in future editions
Your content, Your Expertise,
Your Industry Needs YOUR Expert Voice & We've got the platform you needFind Out How